Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Tribunal administratif, TA de Bordeaux - TA de Lyon le 06/08/2020, n° 2006543 - 2003417

Refus du département d’héberger un mineur isolé révélant une atteinte grave et manifestement illégale à une liberté fondamentale

Jurisprudence · Date de publication : 12/01/2021 · Date de modification : 25/02/2025

Droit à l'hébergement

T.A. Bordeaux, ordonnance n°2003417 du 6 août 2020

T.A. Lyon, ordonnance n°2006543 du 22 septembre 2020

Une personne se déclarant comme mineure non accompagnée est prise en charge durant le confinement lié à l’épidémie de Covid-19. Après avoir été évaluée par le service départemental d’évaluation des mineurs non accompagnés, le département lui notifie une décision de refus de prise en charge au titre de l’ASE au motif que sa minorité n’est pas établie

T.A_Bordeaux_11092020_2004003

TA Lyon 22 09 20

Jurisprudence associée

© Jurislogement 2024
Avec le soutien de la Fondation pour le logement
X